paul's reviews....
5 posters
Page 3 of 5
Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: paul's reviews....
Oh good! I did worry for a sec that you migh actually be female, and I got it wrong!
Re: paul's reviews....
Oh dear. But you didn't need to inform us though. And really, you shouldn't be admitting to doing such things.. and you call me insane
Re: paul's reviews....
E, A, B, A Chord progressions or those of the same structure but in another key.... they are so simple yet effective..... but bore the buggeration out of me.... so much so that i tried to write a song, which ended up as copycat, using this progression...... but it still wandered off somewhere else.... it's amazing how many times people use that formula and get away with it... i say...more experimentation please.... it's a bit like that song by the view which should be go 'i've played the same 3 chords for 4 songs now'.... it gets annoying really quickly....
Hair it grows too fucking quickly really.... and costs money to be removed.... unless you do it yerself and look like a twat.... and also... there seems to be more of it pointing at the ceiling lately..... which is really pretty and that but if you had a hair phobia or something, it would make you die..... Hair of the face... that's annoying too as it grows at a much faster rate than other hair and you can literally go to bed looking young and wake up looking like an old fisherman....grr! so i say ban hair!!
Trousers Why they are called 'trousers' and not 'a trouser' is beyond me.... it can't be because of the two legs making it plural, because they are clearly identified as 'trouser legs' which is a seperate thing altogether.... and a skirt, technically, should be called 'a trouser' if trousers are trousers because of the number of leg holes..... more thought should have been put into the naming of trousers at the conception end of trouser manufacturing, then we wouldn't have these problems now... they should have called them...(why 'them'?) Stuart or something like that.....
Hair it grows too fucking quickly really.... and costs money to be removed.... unless you do it yerself and look like a twat.... and also... there seems to be more of it pointing at the ceiling lately..... which is really pretty and that but if you had a hair phobia or something, it would make you die..... Hair of the face... that's annoying too as it grows at a much faster rate than other hair and you can literally go to bed looking young and wake up looking like an old fisherman....grr! so i say ban hair!!
Trousers Why they are called 'trousers' and not 'a trouser' is beyond me.... it can't be because of the two legs making it plural, because they are clearly identified as 'trouser legs' which is a seperate thing altogether.... and a skirt, technically, should be called 'a trouser' if trousers are trousers because of the number of leg holes..... more thought should have been put into the naming of trousers at the conception end of trouser manufacturing, then we wouldn't have these problems now... they should have called them...(why 'them'?) Stuart or something like that.....
Re: paul's reviews....
Hahaha! Banning facial hair, I'm with you on that. However, my aunt used to be a hairdresser, so I have never paid for a hair cut in my life
And I never realised there was a problem with calling trousers "trousers".. I haven't heard anyone else complain about it
And I never realised there was a problem with calling trousers "trousers".. I haven't heard anyone else complain about it
Re: paul's reviews....
could be...but you have to admit...the notion of trousers is quite preposterous
Re: paul's reviews....
No, I quite like it. "Trouser" is a horrible sounding word.. should be trousers.
Re: paul's reviews....
Nope, it sounds too much like dingdong, and that makes me think of other things.
Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 3 of 5
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|